Do you believe it is better for students to function before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, easier to write, more straightforward to read.

PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as prone to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students will change their higher education course while at uni….

Many people believe that it pay for papers is safer to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Many people believe that children needs to do organised activities inside their time that is free while genuinely believe that children must be liberated to do what they need to accomplish within their spare time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent research has revealed 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it might be unfair for this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to get
-furthermore research has revealed that the mind operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as for example studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Lots of people say that globalisation and also the growing amount of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the surroundings. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your position.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop regarding the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect the environment, people must use less energy within their daily lives. However, a lot of people never have changed the real way they live. How come you imagine lots of people have not taken individual action? What could possibly be done to encourage them to do something?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of the commons
– Collective problem – simpler to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What might be done to encourage them to do something?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some believe that could be the responsibility of men and women to take care of the surroundings. Others say it will be the government that will take care regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should take care of the environmental surroundings because:
We are the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should take care of environmental surroundings because:
They have the capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians of the country, which means that collectively they have been guardians regarding the earth… but not true in reality

Conclusion
Both should be doing more!

In a lot of countries small shops and town centers ‘re going away from business, because people have a tendency to drive to your large out-of-town stores. This leads to an increase in car use, and it also implies that people without cars have limited access to stores that are out-of-town. You think advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

This entry was posted in Pay For Essay Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.